Note - from June 24th 2009, this blog has migrated from Blogger to a self-hosted version. Click here to go straight there.
What really shits me is when
media outlets say things like "Consumer Confidence plunged as expected in the
wake of Hurricane Katrina". Let's get it straight: Consumer Confidence
was expected
to fall to a reading of 98; it actually fell to a reading of 86.6...
you will be aware that the consumer confidence survey is a meaningless
stream of piffle, like all survery-based "feeling" data. It has no
correlation with future consumption spending, so what is the point of
it?
Regardless of whether or not it's a pointless
exercise in branding and sloganeering (the same as the supposed
American love of 'Freedom®', where you need a permit to
exercise Constitutionally-provided rights to free association and
expression), the fact is that if you're going to report its decline
relative to what was expected,
then if it's much
worse than what was expected you ought
to say so. Unless, of course, you're living in the Soviet Union under
Stalin or in Communist China under Mao.
Can't have Brand America®
sullied by silly little things like Truth... like the fact that its
pets in Israel are in violation of more UN Resolutions than Saddam
Hussein, Iran, North Korea and Nazi Germay combined (OK, the last one's
an unfair inclusion - I'm using the Jonah Goldberg principle ... "see
if you can get away with it"). Truths like the fact that the US economic model
has never
been genuinely capitalist (well, not since Lincoln started giving away
tracts of railroad land to his cronies), but has been, since the 1850s,
as corrupt as Imperial Rome ever was.
And now, I see
that the Yanks are going to introduce "Hate Speech" laws;
there goes the First Amendment (as if it wasn't a dead letter
anyhow). As J.S. Mill said clearly in section II of On Liberty, the
truth doesn't need laws; through the ages there have been opinions that
have been held as absolutely true by members of the elite, which have
subsequently turned out to be not only false, but reprehensibly so.
Think of Marcus Aurelius' persecution of Christians, for example -
Marcus Aurelius was among the most enlightened of Roman leaders and
scholars, but sought to crush Christianity solely because he thought
Rome required the retention of its State religion. How did a smart man
get it so wrong?
Of course the opinions that got
Galileo imprisoned are another example - there were laws that
prohibited the teaching of any notion that went against the geocentric
model of the universe.
I wonder when it will become a
crime to insult the Dear Leader? I wonder when children will have to
salute pictures of Dear Leader each morning at school assembly, and
read from the Thoughts of Chairman George? (Thankfully, Bush is too
pissed to write anything down).
I wonder when
dissidents will face knocks on the door in the night.
Federal Reserve Open Market Operations
The Fed's Open Market Operations desk
performed 1 repurchase operation; a $9.75billion, overnight
repurchase with $2.998billion in T-backed collateral undertaken at a
9.8 basis point discount to the Fed Funds Rate (FFR). Yet again, a
repurchase with a decent discount, but too small a distribution to the
T-backed bucket.
Major US Indices
As silly as it may seem, I ignored the fact that a buying
divergence was in force at the open, and simply sat on my hands until
almost the end of the first hour; when your data seems unreliable it
pays to sort that issue out before actually pulling the trigger.
The
problem was this: I ignore Globex when examining 15-minute charts,
however when I switch on 'exclude overnight' in my new data-providers'
chart suite, it switches off the first hour as well (obviously the data
machine thinks that the CME opens at 9:30 a.m. Chicago time).
Anyhow
- by the time I had enough 'feel' to decide to jump, the very short
term charts (85 and 260 tick) were deeply oversold, so a bounce was
expected. As it turned out, that trade took less than a minute to
garner the required one point for the day. I can't even show you where
the trade was on the bars on the chart below - I tried to prepare a
chart that did so but it was impossible to read.

I
thought I would waste some space today with a little extra explanation
of my favourite CCI-divergence approach - how to include the "fielder's
choice" elements of the trading arsenal.
Let's say
you've taken the divergence trade for the day, and pocketed your single
point. Let's also say that you're trading a few lots (say, 5). You see
that the market hits overbought (on the %R) after half an hour. What
now?
First: there's no rule that says no shorting. For the
'full bottle', it requires a divergence in the opposite direction (or
at the very least an overbought spike on the CCI above 200). But
there's no impediment to having a crack with a partial position - say 1
contract - to see what develops and to see if you can't pocket some
beer money.
I don't advise this, though - far better
to simply trade in the same direction as the prevailing CCI-bias. But
re-entry in the same direction can also be 'scaled' depending on the
position of the particualr setup in my little taxonomy. First, move to
a shorter timeframe (3-minutes, or down to the micro-scale 85-tick and
260-tick charts) and if you're trading a 5-lot for 'full bottle'
trades, just buy a one-lot every time a 5-period MA of the
14-period %R hits oversold and look for another
point.
Sounds easy, but I bet you sit and
watch ten trades happen, thinking "there's no way this will work - the
thing's dropping like a stone". Precisely.
The
best time to buy is when it looks like the dumbest thing in the world.
Sort of like the big-picture story fundamentally - it looked stupid to
buy stocks in 1984 with the market at a PE of 7.2x trailing earnings...
Anyhow
- that's all for now as far as the methodological stuff goes. If you
can find a market for which it doesn't work, let me know, because there
would be a PhD thesis in how come it didn't; you will have found a
market where there is no such thing as a sentiment extreme.
After a very choppy first hour, the Dow Jones
Industrial Average softened to spend the mid-session
trawling around 10425 looking for dummies who would short a break.
Remember my axiom "Never short a dull market"? Well, it was dull
alright... it spent three and a half hours within 15 points of 10425
before bouncing (as usual, the dullness resolved upwards). After a
test of 10500 (the sessionhigh was 10496) that coincided with a
textbook short signal from a CCI divergence (marked eith red arrows on
the chart above) there was a very high probability short for the
remainder of the session.
By the close, the Dow had
managed to hang on to a rise of 12.58 points (0.12%), closing out the
day at 10456.21 points.
Within the
blue-chip index, 13 stocks rose, the biggest gainers being Boeing
(BA, +2.91% to $66.55) and Altria
Group (MO, +1.34% to $73.49), which
accounted for 23 Dow points between them.
Losers in the Dow numbered 16 and were led by Hewlett Packard
(HPQ, -1.97% to $28.37) and Intel
(INTC, -1.61% to $23.83), with these two
stocks contributing -8 Dow points worth of downward pressure on the
index.
Volume traded was tilted in favour of the losers by 185.1m shares to
138.1m.
The broader S&P500
is harder to manipulate than the Dow (with the Dow you can jsut by the
stocks with the highest hsare prices), so it managed only a 0.03 points
(0%) gain, to end the session at 1215.66. Within the index, gainers
numbered 250, while 227 S&P500 stocks fell for the day. Volume
was tilted 1.2:1 in favour of the losers with 924.92 million units
traded in the winners as compared with 792.47 million traded in the
losers .
Over at Times Square,
the Nasdaq Composite shed 5.04 points (0.24%), to
close at 2116.42, while larger-cap technology issues fared worse with
the Nasdaq100 losing 4.02 points (0.26%), to end
at 1568.84 points. Within the tech benchmark, gainers numbered 37,
while 58 Nasdaq100 stocks fell for the day. Volume was tilted 1.3:1 in
favour of the losers with 422.09 million traded in the losers compared
to 314.76 million in the winners .
NYSE Volume was super-chunky, with 1.95
billion shares changing hands, while Nasdaq Volume was
chunky, with 1.65 billion shares being shifted from one online
brokerage account to another (and back again, in all likelihood).
| Index | Close | Gain(Loss) | % |
| Dow Jones Industrial
Average | 10456.21 | 12.58 | 0.12% |
| S&P500 | 1215.66 | 0.03 | 0% |
| Nasdaq Composite | 2116.42 | -5.04 | -0.24% |
| Nasdaq100 | 1568.84 | -4.02 | -0.26% |
| NYSE Volume | 1.95bn | - | - |
| Nasdaq Volume | 1.65bn | - | - |
Bellwethers
My 9-stock "bellwethers" group rose by
an average of 0.19%
- General Electric (GE) +$0.37
(1.11%) to $33.64;
- Citigroup (C)
unchanged at $45.09;
- Wal Mart
(WMT) -$0.01 (0.02%) to $43.10;
- I.B.M.
(IBM) +$0.58 (0.75%) to $77.99;
- Intel
(INTC) -$0.39 (1.61%) to $23.83;
- Cisco
Systems (CSCO) -$0.20 (1.12%) to $17.72;
- eBay
(EBAY) +$0.39 (1.01%) to $39.11;
- Fannie Mae
(FNM) +$0.52 (1.13%) to $46.70; and
- Freddie
Mac (FRE) +$0.28 (0.51%) to $55.70.
Market Breadth & Internals
NYSE declining Issues beat out advancers by 1895 to 1397, for
a single-day A/D reading of -498; and Nasdaq losers exceeded gainers by
1644 to 1353. The 10-day moving average of the A/D line fell to -272.2
on the NYSE, while the 10dma of the Nasdaq A/D fell to -126.3.
On the NYSE declining volume was greater
than volume in advancing issues by 1087.8 to 816.6 million shares; On
the Nasdaq declining volume exceeded volume in advancing issues by
917.3 to 697 million shares.
91 NYSE-listed stocks rose to new 52-week highs, and 114
posted fresh 52-week lows, while on the Nasdaq there were 89 stocks
that hit new 52-week highs, and 57 which fell to fresh 52-week lows.
| NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Advancers | 1397 | 1353 |
| Decliners | 1895 | 1644 |
| Advancing Volume (m) | 816.58 | 697.01 |
| Declining Volume (m) | 1087.76 | 917.31 |
| New Highs | 91 | 89 |
| New Lows | 114 | 57 |
| Index | Close | Gain(Loss) | % |
| CBOE Volatility Index | 12.76 | -0.28 | -2.15% |
| CBOE Nasdaq
Volatility Index | 14.39 | -0.43 | -2.9% |
| Equity Put-Call Ratio | 0.7 | -0.16 | -18.6% |
| 10-day PCR | 0.62 | -0.02 | -3.13% |
| SPX-VIX Ratio | 95.3 | 2.05 | 2.2% |
Bond Market Analysis
Bonds fell marginally at the long end, with the yield on the
benchmark 30-year Treasury bond rising 0.6 bps to
4.564%.
The middle of the yield curve was broadly lower in price as
well: five year yields rose to 4.127%, and ten-year yields rose to
4.301%.
Spreads between short-dated (2-yr)
Treasuries and high-grade corporate bonds of similar maturity profiles
were 6.0 bps wider at -1.0 basis points; spreads between longer dated
Treasuries and their corporate AAA counterparts rose to 30.0 bps for
10-year AAA, and 66.0 bps for 20-years.
| Index | Close | Gain(Loss) | % |
| UST 13wk (yld) | 3.405 | -0.02 | -0.58% |
| UST 2Y (yld) | 4.07 | 0.03 | 0.74% |
| UST 5Y (yld) | 4.127 | 0.014 | 0.34% |
| UST 10Y (yld) | 4.301 | 0.007 | 0.16% |
| UST 30Y (yld) | 4.564 | 0.006 | 0.13% |
The Banks Index
dipped 0 points (0%), ending the day at 96.24; within the index,
- Fifth Third Bancorp
(FITB) -$0.44 (1.17%) to $37.02;
- National
City Corp (NCC) -$0.30 (0.87%) to $34.14;
- Regions
Financial (RF) -$0.13 (0.42%) to $31.19;
- Comerica
(CMA) -$0.14 (0.24%) to $58.97; and
- MBNA
Corp (KRB) -$0.05 (0.2%) to $24.50.
The Broker-dealer Index posted a rise of
0.45 points (0.26%), at 175.19; the ticket clippers
lined up as follows -
- Bear
Stearns (BSC) +$2.01 (1.93%) to $106.16;
- Jeffries
Group (JEF) +$0.44 (1.07%) to $41.65;
- Lehman
Brothers (LEH) +$1.08 (0.94%) to $116.00;
- Morgan
Stanley (MWD) +$0.46 (0.89%) to $52.37; and
- Legg
Mason (LM) +$0.64 (0.59%) to $108.38.
The Philadelphia SOX (Semiconductor) index lost
5.7 points (1.23%), at 457.13
- Micron Technology (MU) -$0.36
(2.98%) to $11.74;
- Texas Instruments
(TXN) -$0.85 (2.52%) to $32.92;
- Infineon
Tech (IFX) -$0.21 (2.2%) to $9.34;
- National
Semiconductors (NSM) -$0.48 (1.91%) to $24.66; and
- Maxim
Integrated (MXIM) -$0.71 (1.71%) to $40.89.
Gold & Silver Markets
Gold fell by $3.3 (0.71%) to close at
$462.90 per ounce. It looks like it's got indigestion following its
recent highly-spiced move up above all technical upside extremes.
The
Gold Bugs Index shed 5.26 points (2.17%), at 237.49
- Golden
Star (GSS) -$0.31 (8.54%) to $3.32;
- Randgold
Resources (GOLD) -$0.67 (4.11%) to $15.63;
- Coeur
d'Alene (CDE) -$0.15 (3.5%) to $4.13;
- Iamgold
(IAG) -$0.22 (2.92%) to $7.31; and
- Gold
Fields (GFI) -$0.40 (2.86%) to $13.61.
Silver fell by $0.04 (0.5%) to close at
$7.33 per ounce. The Gold and Silver Index (XAU)
lost 1.81 points (1.62%), ending the day at 109.87 points.
- Durban
Rooderpoert Deep (DROOY) -$0.09 (6.08%) to $1.39;
- Anglogold
Ashanti (AU) -$1.30 (2.99%) to $42.20;
- Gold
Fields (GFI) -$0.40 (2.86%) to $13.61; and
- Placer
Dome (PDG) -$0.42 (2.43%) to $16.85.
| Index | Close | Gain(Loss) | % |
| Gold | 462.90 | -3.30 | -0.71% |
| Silver | 7.33 | -0.04 | -0.5% |
| PHLX Gold and Silver
Index | 109.87 | -1.81 | -1.62% |
| AMEX Gold BUGS Index | 237.49 | -5.26 | -2.17% |
Oil Market
Oil lost ground, shedding $0.75 per barrel
and closing at $65.07 per barrel. The Oil and Gas Index (XOI)
slid 1.62 points (0.15%), to end the session at 1074.65
- Royal
Dutch Shell (RD) -$0.85 (1.32%) to $63.75;
- Repsol
YPF (REP) -$0.29 (0.88%) to $32.51; and
- ConocoPhillips
(COP) -$0.40 (0.58%) to $68.98.
The Oil service stocks (OSX) Index shed
0.03 points (0.02%), ending the day at 175.31
- Rowan
Companies (RDC) -$0.65 (1.8%) to $35.51;
- Noble
Corp (NE) -$0.96 (1.37%) to $69.19; and
- GlobalSantaFe
(GSF) -$0.58 (1.26%) to $45.36.
| Index | Close | Gain(Loss) | % |
| Reuters CRB | 325.94 | 1.23 | 0.38% |
| Crude Oil Light Sweet | 65.07 | -0.75 | -1.14% |
| Heating Oil | 2.094 | 0.01 | 0.25% |
| Natural Gas | 13.12 | -0.02 | -0.13% |
| Unleaded Gas | 2.0915 | 0.01 | 0.6% |
| AMEX Oil Index | 1074.65 | -1.62 | -0.15% |
| Oil Service Index | 175.31 | -0.03 | -0.02% |
Currency Markets
| Index | Close | Gain(Loss) | % |
| US Dollar Index | 89.57 | 0.51 | 0.57% |
| Euro | 1.2013 | -0.0059 | -0.49% |
| Yen | 113.295 | 1.13 | 1.01% |
| Sterling | 1.7664 | -0.0128 | -0.72% |
| Australian Dollar | 0.7559 | -0.0013 | -0.17% |
| Swiss Franc | 1.2959 | 0.0066 | 0.51% |
| Canadian Dollar | 0.849 | -0.0037 | -0.43% |